我下面的代码是批量更新数据库里BLOB字段,测试之后发现更新1000条50KB的图片要17秒,而C#只需要13秒,理论上我使用OCI应该比C#快,但现在却要慢得多,不知道我的方法正不正确,有没有其他好的方法?
- C/C++ code
/* * 根据ID批量更新BLOB数据 * @param ID和图片路径组成的集合 * @param 表名称 * @param 主键名称 * @param BLOB字段名称 * @param 失败的记录 */bool OracleStatementImpl::CopyBlobIn(map<string,string>& fileNames, const string& tableName, const string& primaryKey, const string& blobColumnName, map<string,string>& failure){ failure.clear(); reset(); string sql = "update "+ tableName + " set "+ blobColumnName + " = :1" +" where " + primaryKey +" = :2"; char buffer[255]; CHECK(_sessImpl->errhp, OCIDescriptorAlloc((dvoid *) _sessImpl->envhp, (dvoid **) &lobl, (ub4)OCI_DTYPE_LOB, (size_t) 0, (dvoid **) 0)); CHECK(_sessImpl->errhp, OCILobCreateTemporary(_sessImpl->svchp,_sessImpl->errhp,lobl,0,SQLCS_IMPLICIT, OCI_TEMP_BLOB, OCI_ATTR_NOCACHE, OCI_DURATION_SESSION)); CHECK(_sessImpl->errhp, OCIStmtPrepare(stmthp, _sessImpl->errhp, (ub1*)sql.c_str(), strlen(sql.c_str()), OCI_NTV_SYNTAX, OCI_DEFAULT)); CHECK(_sessImpl->errhp, OCIBindByPos(stmthp, &m_pBind, _sessImpl->errhp, 1, (dvoid*)&lobl, sizeof(OCILobLocator *), SQLT_BLOB, 0,0,0,0,0, OCI_DEFAULT)); CHECK(_sessImpl->errhp, OCIBindByPos(stmthp, &m_pBind, _sessImpl->errhp, (ub4)2, (dvoid*)buffer, (sb4)sizeof(buffer), (ub2)SQLT_AVC, 0,0,0,0,0, OCI_DEFAULT)); _sessImpl->begin(); for(map<string,string>::iterator file = fileNames.begin(); file != fileNames.end(); file++) { strcpy(buffer,file->first.c_str()); sb4 status = OCIStmtExecute(_sessImpl->svchp, stmthp, _sessImpl->errhp, (ub4)1, (ub4) 0, (CONST OCISnapshot *) NULL, (OCISnapshot *) NULL, OCI_DEFAULT); if(status == OCI_NO_DATA) { failure.insert(*file); continue; } FILE* fp = fopen(file->second.c_str(), (const char *) "rb"); if(!fp) { failure.insert(*file); continue; } stream_write_lob(lobl, fp, get_file_length(fp)); fclose(fp); } _sessImpl->commit(); CHECK(_sessImpl->errhp,OCIDescriptorFree((dvoid *) lobl, (ub4) OCI_DTYPE_LOB)); return (failure.size() == 0);}
------解决方案--------------------
汗,遇到了类似的问题,不过我的是批量获取blob字段慢~~~